🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold action to ban social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Politicians, safety advocates, and families are observing closely to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

The European Momentum

Across Europe, a rising chorus of nations are moving toward similar restrictions.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister declaring that phones and apps are "stealing our youngsters' childhood". A law could be formalized next year.
• Norway is planning to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to shield children from the "power of the AI".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban is "a potential measures under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has asked lawmakers to pass a proposal lifting the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a comparable step, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has urged guardians to restrict their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has approved a non-binding statement calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 except if parental consent is given. Even though it warns of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the resolution does not enact mandatory rules.

"A clear age restriction is a solid starting point," commented the European lawmaker supporting the resolution.

The UK: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a potential ban, stating that "nothing is off the table" but stressing any action must be "supported by strong evidence".

Previously, support grew behind a legislative effort to impose limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually weakened. Nonetheless, the administration committed to conduct more studies the topic.

Campaign organizations have raised apprehensions. One foundation established by the relatives of a teenager who took her own life after viewing harmful online content contends that a simple age ban could fail to improve online safety and could result in a "cliff edge" of exposure when young people become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the failure of the social media companies to design platforms and apps that are appropriate and suitable for young users," commented a leading child protection advocate.

The US: A Fragmented Picture

In the United States, action is mostly occurring at the local level amid national gridlock.

• The state of Utah demands adult approval for minors to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has signed a bill banning under-14s from accessing social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has passed a regulation restricting minors to a single hour of social media use per day, with any further time dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly introduced laws mandating parental consent for minors to create social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and proposals from certain figures to follow the Australian lead, a nationwide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Perspectives

Beyond Europe and the US, additional countries are also considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for Instagram to 16.

However, international bodies strike a more measured position. A major UN agency has warned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "might prove counterproductive". The organization points out that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for isolated youth and that bans should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to invest in safety.

Even as this international discussion continues, the steps of the Australian government and its followers show that policymakers globally are less and less prepared to wait for the industry to act voluntarily.