🔗 Share this article

Itranspired he endured defeat by Grimsby. He weathered losing a crucial European final versus one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He withstood losing at home against domestic rivals, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, undermining some of the club’s most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to engage. You come at the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. The most distracted of readers will notice the irony here: a manager who frequently berated at his players for failing in one-on-one duels succumbing in the face of the intense pressure and formidable presence of a the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

And frankly, this whole painful saga appears to portray the director in a different perspective. It may have been tempting, based on his brief stint in a similar role at Southampton, to view him as little more than a drudge within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due largely to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated manager, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate a previous executive before him, Jason Wilcox has proved himself as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind that United’s competitors are now justifiably concerned.

A Tactical Clash Over System & Ideology

For example, it was Jason Wilcox , after being involved in the hierarchy that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, was instrumental in trying to persuade Amorim to ditch his favored 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these pleas were resisted. However, such directives carry more weight when delivered from the mouth with the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a role in a championship team from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time he may be persuaded to outline his thought processes publicly. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is walking away with a full payout, with no compensation reduction clause activated. The director seldom speaks in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers in football – men like Jason Wilcox – function at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not quite equivalent to being ready to receive.

An Ultimate Authority In the Throne

But of course, in training our focus on the sporting director we overlook the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the commands of his ultimate line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his desire for a back four. It is reported, the owner has also proposed deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for United to adopt data science and metrics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he declared that United’s style to football “shall be decided by this group”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical football matters, drawing from his background in industry and sailing. Above all he is incredibly rich, and as we all know, the wealthy are superior: more perceptive, more wise, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Whom else would you trust to oversee an enlightened programme of austerity, the building of a modern arena that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The Modern Football Order: Directors Over Managers

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent in top-tier of the game. For decades, clubs foolishly entrusted major sporting choices to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and energy to join a club and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many businesses have these guys established? How many mass redundancies have they managed? Far preferable to invest the real power where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the strategy by the directors and appoint someone who can tailor their offering accordingly. If managers were once chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the product, but still ultimately answerable should it be delivered cold or leaks out of the box.

Nowadays, their job is increasingly not about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the receptionist of the operation, the public face for a club they can do little to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into Europe and wins domestic cups, and effectively gets sacked for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy sees his reputation ruined while those individuals who hired him live to blunder another day.

A Neoliberal Football: Responsibility for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism at work: the elevation of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose decisions are always untouchable, whose errors can always be sacked away without explanation. Appoint the system coach and then dismiss them for using excessively that system. Bring in the process guy and later discard him for taking excessive time. And above all show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest summer signings, for the fact that the grownups – however well qualified – remain in control.